Posted by: randalv | March 14, 2010

The Value of Complaining

I want to puzzle through something that’s been bothering me lately: Why do people complain?

The interesting thing to me about complaining is that people are often talking about real obstacles–having a lot of work, being tired, dealing with a manager that disagrees with them. But somewhere that discussion about the real obstacle becomes a complaint session that just seems pointless to me. My attitude is often, “Fine. Jane disagrees with you. What are you going to say to convince her?” Or “Fine. Jane disagrees with you. Accept it and figure out how to make her ideas work.” Or “You know this isn’t going to change, and it will always bother you. Maybe it’s time to leave.”

My running idea is that complaining is a form of wish-fulfillment. When you say, “Why doesn’t my idiot manager just see that I’m right about this?” It’s like a day dream, same as imagining winning the lottery. And some people spend their lives in the day dreams, rather than putting together a plan to make that million dollars or accepting that they can’t and instead trying to budget their time. Though I think that complaining is more specific–its wish-fulfillment about your problems going away.

I definitely think people complain too much, but is complaining always pointless? I once attended a seminar by Jean Moroney on “Tackling Hard Thinking,” where she suggested complaining as a productive method. When you are stuck on a problem like the above manager situation, she suggests taking a few minutes to complain on paper about the situation. By doing that, you can clarify the problem, going into why your manager is stuck in her ways and how things would be better if she agreed. And that gives you more ammunition in creating a plan to actually change her mind or greater conviction that she’s beyond argument. I think this is another way in which complaining is like wishing. The value of fantasizing about winning the lottery is that you clarify exactly what you want but don’t normally let yourself think about. And then you can think about whether you actually do have the ability to get those things.

The other value of complaining is that it’s definitely better to get your emotions out than repress them. If you gave yourself a standing order against complaining, you might be cut off from knowing what was actually bothering you. Now that I think about it, that’s another way in which the value of complaining is clarity, about yourself rather than about the things outside of you.

So I guess where I’m at is this: do your complaining. Get clearer about yourself and the rest of the world. Then get on with things.

Posted by: randalv | February 22, 2010

What You Gain From Success

Today I completed the most significant project of my life. It’s worth taking a second to honor that.

In May 2008, a month after I joined JetBlue, I was asked to support a colleague in the creation of a huge project. JetBlue’s legendary Principles of Leadership series is one of the reasons I joined the company, and amazingly enough, we were to create the third. Further, the other two classes were directed at teaching front-line leaders what leadership looks like at JetBlue: this one was directed at the top level of leadership–Directors, Vice-Presidents, and Senior Vice-Presidents. The scope of this project could not be exaggerated, and I was very wet behind the ears in my field. I had a moment of fear, but of course, I was excited beyond belief.

I think that I was enlisted mostly in an apprentice capacity, to get me exposed to big projects, but I quickly became a full creative partner, out of necessity as much as out of my passion for the project. My colleague Greg and I worked long nights for weeks on end, trying to create something that made sense and was valuable. Since this was such a high profile project and so important to get right, we were constantly rethinking and rethinking the project from scratch to incorporate new feedback from each new concerned party. It was exhausting.

This was a solid nine months of serious creative work, and along the way, I learned the meaning of the term “burnt out.” I don’t think I really understood it before. To be burnt out is not to be tired; it’s to have overcome being tired over and over again by force of will and your love for what you’re doing. It’s doing that enough times and pulling so much from yourself that you wake up one day with no love left.

The dry run was a debacle of unprofessionalism meeting high expectations. Greg and I got up in front of our team to deliver a class that we had been revising the day before, a class we had barely practiced and which was full of mistakes. About a week afterward, one of my leaders pulled met with me to deliver some bad news: I’d been largely pulled from teaching duties for the class, a vote of no confidence that I understood and even somewhat agreed with, even if I admitted that I was deeply disappointed by it. When we ran the pilot class for the first time, we were met with a group that came excited and did seem to get something from parts of the experience, but ultimately left bored and vocally disappointed. Greg and I made yet another overhaul, which we thought solved the problems. We prepared properly this time, and then held our breath. The first class’s participants were our team’s Director, the other Directors in our Department, our VP; observing were my Manager and all of the other Managers on my day-to-day team. Namely, every single person we could consider a leader, other than the CEO, was in one room; and we were supposed to tell them something they didn’t know about being a leader. This is a lot of pressure to put on a twenty-nine year old.

And we were a huge hit, delivering a class that was considered engaging, entertaining, and highly valuable. Post-class surveys showed a consensus that we’d given them two-days well-worth their extremely precious time. Over the next few months, we delivered the same class to the senior leaders of almost every Department, people I admire and would have been nervous to talk to months before.

Today we completed the last official class of the project as we brought the Corporate Affairs department through, comprised of the people in charge of Legal, Government Affairs, and Corporate Communication for JetBlue. It was considered another significant success. The project isn’t completely put to bed, as we may run a significantly-changed variation of it at some point in the future, but essentially, to quote the Muppets, we have done what we set out to do.

So that brings me to now, sitting cold outside my apartment, trying to type out a few thoughts before going inside to see my Ginny for the night. I ask myself what I’m thinking. There’s a common (I think Buddhist) phrase that I see in books and magazines now, that the goal is not the destination but the journey. It’s that you shouldn’t live your life dependent on whether you achieve success; instead, focus on the joys and challenges along the way. There’s certainly something to that; you get to live in your success for only, what, a few days? And then life moves on, and you’re back to spending months in pursuit of another possible goal. If the journey were miserable, it just wouldn’t be worth it.

But at the same time, if the destination gave you nothing, wouldn’t the journey be meaningless?  What does it mean to succeed in this kind of serious way? What do you get from it?

Let me start with my emotions right now. If I had to sum them up, they would be a profound kind of pride and calm. My mind naturally went to the details of the last year and a half, pausing over every challenge to note just how hard this was and what kind of accomplishment it is. The funny thing when you’re in the midst of the journey is that you can forget the challenges as soon as you’re past them. It’s just kind of amazing how many times I was beating my head against the wall and then how natural and simple the final product is.

I think also of the effect of my efforts. The goal was to get every department in JetBlue thinking consciously about the health of the company and of their particular departments and then doing what they could to improve it. I think we did that. I think we made the company healthier. And I think that we have potential for further impact by bringing up the lessons of the class in future events. We have a base to build from. It’s hard to disagree that the company has become better in the last year. Do we have a hand in that? It’s hard to say, but I think so.

Next, I built a reputation for myself and a comfort with some pretty important people that intimidated the hell out of me before. That’s huge, and it will provide a platform to work with these people in the future.

Finally, and I think most importantly, I think grew tremendously. My favorite compliment from the last few years was that there was tremendous difference between how I was in the front of the class for the Dry Run versus for the last class. I went from vague and uncertain to a credible expert with command over my classroom and comfort with my participants. Nothing is more valuable than the fact that I can now trust myself to take on much more interesting goals than I could before.

So tonight I sleep. Tomorrow I put some of this new confidence to use, as I work on another class, “Supervising a Shift.” It’s one that I’ve been working hard on for months. I think it has potential but isn’t yet good. But I’ve made the latest Principles of Leadership class now. That’s something I know I’m capable of. So why can’t I do it again?

Someone should make a book collecting the great graduation speeches by successful people. I really appreciated Rowling’s point about stripping your life down to the essentials and ignoring others’ wishes for you. That said, I don’t think it’s necessary to fail to do so, though it does make a good story.

The Fringe Benefits of Failure, and the Importance of Imagination | Harvard Magazine.

Posted by: randalv | January 29, 2010

Awesomeness vs. Sickness

I recently came off of two weeks of sickness. I named the sickness Juan, as I picked it up in the Dominican Republic. Juan started with a two-day fever, followed by two weeks of exhaustion and frequent bouts of hacking cough. I hate Juan.

What I have learned in my two weeks is that sickness sucks. It sucks bad. At first, I enjoyed catching up on “Parks and Recreation” episodes and reading. And that took about four hours to get old. It’s not that I don’t like these things; I love them. Finding the time to read is a continuous struggle day-to-day. I took two days completely off my feet; you’d think that could be time very well spent.

The problem is that you get what you give when it comes to work, reading, thought; and I had little to give. Accomplishments, even intellectual ones, require significant energy. You have to “gear up” and prepare to bring all of your creativity and intelligence to the table; and then the actual act of thought requires many individual, nimble actions of asking questions, searching through your memory for relevant knowledge, pulling back to see the wider issues, plunging in. When you are in the midst of thought, you aren’t always aware of all of these actions, as you are focused on the problem. But it’s all happening.

When I was sick, I could barely get up to put on socks, let alone do mental gymnastics. Even after the fever passed and I was back at work, I couldn’t quite gear up, and I could only sustain whatever I was working on for short periods of time.

So that’s the shocking, unexpected conclusion of the day. Sickness sucks. Drink fluids.

‘Space diver’ to attempt first supersonic freefall – space – 22 January 2010 – New Scientist.

The highest parachute jump yet. From 20 miles up (the Stratosphere ends at 31 miles). He will wear a space suit so his blood doesn’t boil from the low atmosphere.

Posted by: randalv | January 17, 2010

Be Like Gravity

From the coach who turned around Agassi’s game, in Agassi’s book Open: “Quit going for the knockout, he says. Stop swinging for the fences. All you have to be is solid…Be like >gravity,< man, just like motherfucking gravity…Perfection? There’s about five times a year you wake up perfect, when you can’t lose to anybody, but it’s not those five times a year that make a tennis player. Or a human being, for that matter. It’s the other times.”

I’ve been repeating this phrase “Be like gravity” to myself a lot recently, ever since reading Agassi’s book a few weeks ago. It’s been running through my mind particularly on a big project I’m currently working on–a class built around a complicated role play with a lot of moving parts. Sometimes I get tired or discouraged at the difficulty and my emotions rebel at the idea of going further. When I remind myself to be like gravity, everything changes. I find myself recommitted and refocused, ready to do some good work.

So what’s the big deal here? What does it mean to be like gravity? Well, what do we know about gravity? It’s powerful, powerful enough to keep you on this planet and to keep the entire universe in motion. It’s also unwavering. You cannot argue with gravity, cannot expect it to let up. It is simply a fact of life, and you have to accept and adapt to it. Which would you rather face off against if you were a tennis player: an emotionally volatile Agassi that is just as likely to self-destruct as beat you or an Agassi that simply will not let up?

To “be like gravity” is to bring your best to the table every time. The opposite, which I’ve seen in myself and I think is common, is to work in surges. It’s the romantic idea that it’s all on the line this time, so this time I’m going to bring my A-game. As Agassi’s coach puts it, it’s swinging for the fences, going for the knockout, putting it all on the line. And it usually means trying to act well above your actual ability, in an impassioned but fairly uncontrolled way.

The teenager in me is kicking up in protest right now, because it feels like I’m advocating mediocrity or a boring but consistent existence. Is this shift in thinking part of the process of settling down to live an uninspired life? I don’t think so. I think I’m advocating the kind of mentality that is required to pursue exciting, ambitious goals. Those kinds of goals are always, necessarily long-term.

The exciting stuff isn’t won and lost on one moment; it’s won and lost by how persistently you hammer away at your exciting goals. Even the short-term or one-time goals are actually long-term goals in disguise (but that’s for another post).

I also don’t think that being like gravity means that you aren’t living a passionate life. Passion is the fuel for all work worth doing. If you are showing up, checking off your work, and going home; that’s not being like gravity. It’s not bringing your best self consistently, which requires passion and focus. I think I’m just advocating bringing that passion to the table persistently, instead of erratically.

Posted by: randalv | January 6, 2010

Profile in Awesomeness: Film composer Hans Zimmer

I love film scores, especially film scores to action films. Where else do you get exciting, dynamic classical music these days? Hans Zimmer is one of my favorites, especially his Crimson Tide, Thin Red Line, and Gladiator.

Click here for an interview with this excitable, talented, apparently approachable giant. It always makes me happy when people I like live up to the quality of their work.

PS Zimmer is the one on the left in the attached photo.

Posted by: randalv | January 1, 2010

What to Expect in 2010

Happy 2010!

As one of my resolutions for the year is to post more (26 entries by the end–hold me to it), I’m going to keep this post short and unambitious. One point and I’m out.

New Years is my favorite holiday. It is >the< holiday of self-improvement, when you take stock of the previous year and dedicate yourself to what you want to change in the year to come. In addition to my 26 posts, I plan to tackle my details problem (see previous post), which I think is really a tendency to rush the double-checking process. I am pledging to double-check every important email I send and to continue to show up to events I am running an extra half hour earlier than I'm expected.

As to '09, it was my best yet. It was marked by several solid classes I co-created or ran and by moving in with my girlfriend in a neighborhood and life we love. I also started this blog, which I consider crucial in my growth to the level of wisdom in my field I think I need.

It's hard to think of how the next year will top 2009, except that I expect it will. If you remain dedicated to your life and to learning and understanding more and achieving more always, then shouldn't progress be the norm? That's not to say that it's guaranteed, as I could always get struck by lightning or the economy could fall apart at a whole new level or the government could choose to tax Randal Vegters at a 100% rate or whatnot. But those things are not the norm, and I have no particular reason to expect them.

Leaving aside the exceptionally awful things, I have every reason to believe that 2010 is going to be frickin awesome. And if I have every reason to believe that this New Year is going to rock my world, then I have every reason to believe that this New Decade is going to as well. And if you choose to take them on as well, then you do, too. Let's see how it all turns out!

Posted by: randalv | October 18, 2009

A New Focus Pt. Two: …And One Big Mental Weakness

2097254787_26189db5f2_o

[Part one: A New Focus Pt. 1: My Top Two Mental Strengths…]

And that brings me back to a key weakness of mine–details. Nine out of ten times when I fail at something, it’s because of a failure with details. I have trouble noticing them, retaining them, remembering to check on them.

The other day, I went out of my way to make sure I’d taken care of all of my work commitments before I went on vacation. I felt pretty good about myself, that I was being responsible when it was truly inconvenient. One of the things that I had to do was significantly modify a file and send it to participants of a class I’d taught. I made the modifications, wrote an email to the participants…and then sent it with the original, unmodified file. Such an easy thing to correct, but it just wasn’t my natural inclination. You can excuse that once as a simple mistake, but it was an embarassing one, and it happens much too frequently.

I contrast this with my girlfriend, Ginny, who is excellent with details. She remembers the exact time when a flight we are taking is going to take off or land, the names and occupations and histories of people we meet. More deeply, she cares about getting these things right, in a way that’s similar to my concern with the structure of a class I’m creating. I care when I mess up because of my weaknesses, but it’s a chore to me to focus on getting them right. I look at her and people like her as something of an alien phenomenon. They are doing something different from me–I have some inklings as to what it might be–but I don’t know what that is clearly. And I definitely have a long way to go toward mastering it myself.

[Ginny says that I am blowing this out of proportion, though she would agree that it's not my strong suit. Fine, I've been concerned with it for a while now, and it's still not a strength. That's frustrating, and I want to fix it.]

[Now she feels weird that a stray comment she made is ending up in the blog. That'll teach her not to think!]

So that will be my focus for a while: how do you train yourself to be strong at details? There are a lot of related topics; including habit-building, memory, aligning your emotions with your goals. I’m looking forward to it and to moving forward with a clearer sense of purpose.

Posted by: randalv | October 2, 2009

A New Focus Pt. 1: My Top Two Mental Strengths…

thats_a_strong_dog_photosculpture-p153829802824915673qdjh_400I’ve been playing with the format of the blog for the last few months. My goal is for it to be a productive forum for my education while still being convenient enough to fit into my crazy schedule. To do that, I’ve played with writing essays as entries and with posting related news. The blog now is pretty convenient for me; I post relevant news on a regular basis and I write commentary when I have time.

But I’m not comfortable with the directionlessness. I don’t feel the blog (and hence my education) is going anywhere. So here comes another iteration. I’m going to try to keep the majority of my entries related to one central topic at a time. Likely, these topics will be things I am having trouble with, especially in terms of core mental habits.

I have a problem in mind, but in order to explain the problem, I’m actually going to start with some key strengths. I am describing them not for the sake of congratulating myself (I do that enough in private) but to try to clarify what I mean by a “mental habit” and to paint the full picture, since I think my strengths and weaknesses might be related.

I tend to be good at things that are related to maybe two core mental habits. First, I pay close attention to my emotions and always try to understand them and use them for course-correction. To borrow an idea from my favorite filmmaker Joss Whedon, the key to success is love. If you know what you love, then your emotions can guide you in your pursuit. They will tell you when something’s wrong and you need to pay more attention, and also when you can just trust things as they are now.

When I am designing a class for JetBlue, I’m useless at it until I understand how the class could possibly help someone be better at their work. That’s a subject that I care about passionately. Once that connection happens, I am very naturally always on the hunt for ways to make the class better. When someone makes a good suggestion, I leap at it. When the design isn’t gelling, I am deeply frustrated in a way that can be bizarre to others. I plug away until I fix the problem. This can even be crippling for me at times when I don’t see how to solve a problem, but there’s a strong incentive then to figure out why I don’t see how to solve the problem.

The second thing I do is to seek to understand the deeper or broader meaning behind particulars, and I am concerned with my level of certainty in forming those conclusions. If a coworker is having trouble with their manager, I want to understand why that trouble exists, and I question the answers that I come to or that others provide. It’s the only way to do what I’m trying to do with this blog and have it relate to reality at all.

These things are just an absolute part of me. They do not happen automatically and I can’t guarantee that I always do them successfully, but the idea and the emotion to do them do come to me automatically. So why couldn’t I make something else an absolute part of me, something that I’m maybe not so good at?

(To Be Continued)

Older Posts »

Categories